Sometime between now and August . . ..
. . . erm, this timescale makes a hard recommendation a bit tricky. FWIW here's a snapshot of my current thoughts/plans:
At the moment, the best C2D motherboard(s) for use by adults are probably based on the i975 chipset
(reasons below); but within your timescale Intel are replacing their current i965/i975 family of chipsets with the Bearlake (http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1062/intel_p35_bearlake_chipset_performance_preview/index.htm) jobbies.
This upcoming family of chipsets will support DDR3, as well as DDR2 [implementation, specifically any dual-format/crossover (http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=8133) implementation, is up to individual manufacturers], is made with the 65mnm process [90nm for the i965/110nm for the i975], & will include the 'Bearlake-G' aka G33 version with onboard graphics - certainly adequate for Vista Aero/DX10 on middling-resolution display devices.
DDR3 is a better design than DDR2 [better latency characteristics/lower power consumption]; but is unlikely to be affordable
(ie 'cheap') until Q1 2008.
The 'Bearlake' family of chipsets also have native support for the upcoming 45nm 'Penryn' process-shrink developments of the current 65nm Core2Duo family [likely available surprisingly soon - perhaps mid-Q3 2007], together with up-to-40lane PCIe support for those dolphin-unfriendly folks keen on playing games on their PCs using the current SLI/Crossfire silliness
(ie those who are prepared to fund, power, cool, & quieten dual-vidcards drawing upwards of 300W) . . .
BUT . . . .
The probable operating system will be SUSE 10.2 with VMWare running windows XP
. . I am surprised more hasn't been said (http://www.digitimes.com/mobos/a20060818A7034.html) about the near-certainty that any onboard-graphics, 'Bearlake' family motherboard will have a seamless toe-to-top hardware-level implementation of the entire 'Content Protection' (http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html) mess that drives present-day MS [& alas probably Apple] OS development.
If you read [or re-read] the last link you'll see this is a real issue even for those sane folks not planning on funding poor Mr Gates' retirement fund through purchase of the ghasty 'Vista' thingie: the hassle lies in the hardware malarkey - essentially copy-locking - to be built in to the interfaces between source
(video AND audio), computation, & display devices.
IMHO it is sensible for those evading Vista & all it entails to interrupt/ignore/leave holes in this sequence of hardware locks - I certainly intend to avoid any vidcard with a 'working' ie DRM'd [HDMI or HDCP] interface; which means afaik sticking at the 7xxx series of NVIDIA vidcards.
. . so: like you I am seriously considering following Rob's lead & going C2D
(& I have similar OS requirements & upgrade schedule to yours) . .
. . Three essentials are; compatible with SUSE and XP, reliable and relatively quiet
. . a little while ago Rob & I chatted on the previous forum on similar topics: he ended up with a system centered around
(I think) an E6600 C2D & the Foxconn 975X7AB-8EKRS2H (http://www.foxconnchannel.com/Product/motherboard_detail.aspx?ID=en-us0000184) (review1) (http://www.lostcircuits.com/motherboard/foxconn_975x7ab/)(review2) (http://www.virtual-hideout.net/reviews/Foxconn_975X7AB/index.shtml) motherboard.
This last has just now been superceded by a Version 2 (http://www.foxconnchannel.com/Product/motherboard_detail.aspx?ID=en-us0000292) of the same thing: this supports all 65nm C2Ds, & has a rather better physical layout, while sharing the major technical advantages of Rob's Foxconn i975X board:
These are:
a) use of digital VRMs - markedly better reliability/stability compared to capacitor-based VRMs
b) excellent layout round the S775 for today's huge (http://www.silentpcreview.com/article251-page5.html) & quiet CPU coolers - please note the layout linked to, where the thing uses only the flow from 2x sloooow 120mm enclosure-extraction fans [or 1x of these plus the similar fan cooling, say, a Seasonic S12 Energy (http://www.silentpcreview.com/article656-page1.html) ultra-quiet PSU.
c) 2x decent-quality Gbit onboard NICs
(Marvell 88E8056 & Realtek 8110SC) - this use of two different makes of Gbit NIC is a practical advantage when configuring Linux
d) an onboard JMicron IDE/SATA controller - this gives the mobo 2x PATA channels [there's only one available from the i975/i965 chipset] plus a jolly useful eSATA [external SATA] expansion port for tomorrow's affordable external storage.
e) 3x [physical] 16-lane PCIe slots - in fact these share the i975's available 18 or 19 PCIe lanes [the NICs will take at least one lane, probably two] in what is probably a 8+8+2 configuration - as you know, each PCIe lane gives 250MB/s to the attached card/device. These 3x 16-lane physical slots are nicely laid out for a quiet system.
f) very decent 7+1 onboard sound, 2x - one port, one header - onboard Firewire400 from a TI chip,
g) 8x USB2 [4 ports, 4 headers], 1x PATA, 4x SATA with firmware 'RAID' from the excellent ICH-7R (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/03/the_southbridge_battle/page18.html) Southbridge [not alas the even better ICH8]
. . . this list seems to meet or exceed your requirements:
. . Likable options would be, but not essential (so long as I have enough ports to add them); decent onboard graphics with TV output, good to excellent onboard sound with an option to move the inputs to the front of the case, gigabit networking, Serial Raid and a decent amount of USB2 ports.....I don't ask much out of a motherboard do I

. .
except for the onboard graphics; but I personally use & recommend a NVIDIA-based Asus 'Reversecool' (http://uk.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=2&l2=6&l3=271&model=1174&modelmenu=1) (review) (http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles/view.php?cid=3&id=1997) solution for those aiming for very quiet systems: the unique advantage of these vidcards with the GPU on the 'wrong' side is that the large passive heatsink neatly shares the area just below the CPU heatsink, where all the extractive flow is [in the ideal system] from nice quiet slooow Nexus 120mm casefans.
Rob also
(just) managed to fit a large passive Northbridge cooler in place of the annoyingly whiny active cooler on the Foxconn i975 - I would strongly recommend doing this.
. . I hope he'll provide some firsthand feedback on/images of his system plus his thoughts on moving to a C2D.
From my point of view, the compelling reason is the sheer performance that can be easily extracted from a C2D for [say] video-encoding tasks: please have a look at this table (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=970400#post970400) of results using various encoders.
I know from experience that to get better-than-2x [realtime] encoding from Procoder2 at 'Mastering' quality is stunningly fast: I see around 1.3x [realtime] from a rather expensive workstation with 2x 2.6GHz S940 Opterons & 3GB of low-latency memory . . . so I know from experience that at 3GHz
(a fairly easy overclock for a 2.4GHz jobbie) a single C2D would be about 3x as fast as 2x Athlon MPs at 2.4Ghz.
Personally I probably won't be unbearably tempted to switch till an affordable C2D box is 2x as fast as my current dual Opteron box for my day-to-day tasks - this will take a while, probably until the C2D can be made to run at 4GHz or so.
Basic reasons for preferring the Intel i975 chipset to all others are that it uses very little power [so can be cooled passively], has an excellent Southbridge, & is both reliable & compatible with just about any OS.
The cooling issue is a big deal - my NFORCE4 Pro chipset draws [no shit] 40W+ &
has to be actively cooled . . you'll see ludicrously complex & noisy NB/SB cooling solutions on many NFORCE-chipset C2D motherboards. The theoretically desirable AMD/ATI 600 chipset is I think available on only one motherboard [from DFI] & would probably have driver-hassles in Linux.
Oh, one last thing: you'll need at least 2GB [I use Win 32bit's practical max of 3GB] of memory fitted if doing anything serious inside a Win32 vm
(an encode using 2 instances of Procoder2 at Mastering quality uses about 1.2GB - yes, you can run DVDRebuilder inside a Win32 vm guest on a Linux host) - the current 'best buy' is probably the 2GB kit of OCZ's Rev2 version of their 'Platinum' series PC6400 DDR2.
Hope the above helps your planning
